As the library media specialist, teaching is one of my major roles.   I rarely shelve, catalog, or checkout books.  Instead, I collaborate, teach, enrich, and support.  I offer professional learning to teachers on the latest technology.  I attend district meetings to contribute to the discussion of 21st century learning.  I know every grade’s curriculum.  Even though our district has instructional technology specialists and technology technicians, they are spread between multiple buildings making it difficult to support the amount of technology related projects needed at each school.  I am the primary person who models and works alongside teachers in using technology with students.  Because of these things, our school is recognized as being an exemplar for 21st century learning.

At Barrow, our library media program has received the top honor in the state of Georgia:  Exemplary Elementary Library Media Program.  As the media specialist, I have received Library Media Specialist of the Year for Northeast Georgia, the Foundation for Excellence Instructional Leadership Award, and was named a district finalist for Teacher of the Year.  In the past year, I’ve presented at the American Association for School Librarians National Conference and the School Library Journal Leadership Summit in Washington DC. Our media center blog (https://barrowmediacenter.wordpress.com) is internationally read.  The GA DOE has invited us to use their 21st Century Model Classroom to teach and film an exemplar lesson that can be used in professional learning. My library is not the only one in the district to receive prestigious honors.  Clarke Middle has also been named an Exemplary Library Program and Burney Harris will very likely be named Exemplary soon after being named Exceptional two years ago.

CCSD has some of the best library programs in the state.  21st Century instruction is already being modeled in our libraries throughout many of the schools in the district.  Instead of celebrating these programs and asking “what can we do to help you excel?”, our district recognizes our programs by cutting one of the most vital pieces, our media paraprofessionals.  Cutting paraprofessionals will leave a gaping wound in our library programs that cannot simply be fixed with the band-aid of parent volunteers.  Relying on parent volunteers to fulfill a paraprofessional’s role is asking them to assist students in locating materials and research, pull resources for teachers based on standards, lead instructional centers during lessons, shelve hundreds of books per day, assist students with self checkout, catalog all books, run multiple kinds of reports, run the media center each time the librarian is at a collaborative meeting or fixing technology, weed outdated materials, reorganize the library for better patron use, and more.  What’s also disturbing, is that even though our paraprofessionals work with students, teachers, and families everyday in a variety of ways, they are not considered the same as classroom paraprofessionals and have no opportunity to find another job within the district if they are indeed cut.

Cutting paraprofessionals forces every library in our district to make difficult decisions about our programs.  Do we quit collaborating with teachers on standards-based, innovative lessons incorporating technology?  Do we quit fixing broken technology?  Do we tell students that they can only checkout books during certain hours of the day?  Do we quit offering professional learning for teachers and parents on 21st century tools and skills?  Do we quit offering reading incentives and special programs?  Do we close the media center every time we have to be away for planning, meetings, and events?  The list goes on and on.  We can’t realistically continue to offer the programs that we currently offer.  I fear that our libraries will slip into some of the stereotypes that we have worked so hard to break.

I know that we are in extremely tough budget times, but how can you justify cutting a program that has done so much for our students, our teachers, our families, and our district?  How can you cut a program that serves every stakeholder in the school?

I hope you will look at the many suggestions offered through the forums, Myra Blackmon’s collection, and other letters to closely consider alternatives to cutting paraprofessionals.  Even though Dr. Lanoue has said that professional learning will not be cut, I ask you to closely look at how much our district spends on professional learning.  Do we really need to spend thousands of dollars to hire outside consultants to offer professional learning?  Why don’t we look at the exemplary work taking place within our own district and learn from one another for free?  Why not harness the power of social media and teach our teachers how to develop their own professional learning network tailored to what they actually need to learn about?  Rather than have instructional technology specialists that are spread between multiple schools, could we look to our media specialists as leaders in technology within each building and support them each with a full-time paraprofessional?  Could our current technology specialists be a primary source of professional learning for our district rather than bringing in technology consultants such as the UGA ETC? Could our instructional coaches be the primary professional learning for common core?

If you make this cut, I fear that next year, the district will continue to cut our library programs until there’s nothing left but a room full of books and computer checkout stations. Students will enter the room without the support of a trained professional who can help them navigate and evaluate the overwhelming abyss of digital and print information.  I fear that we will have a plethora of technology for our students to use but no true model or support in how to use it.  We will have lost the heart of the school.  Please save our paraprofessionals and our school libraries.